Plaintiff says LA Coroner did not follow the law when cremating her infant's body without her permission.
Law Offices of Christopher Montes de Oca by Christopher Montes de Oca, Los Angeles.
The Omofoma Law Firm by Eseigbe A. Omofoma, Los Angeles.
Schuler & Brown by Jack M. Schuler and Matthew Ames, Van Nuys.
Brian T. Chu, Principal Deputy County Counsel, Office of the Los Angeles County Counsel.
David M. Lechuga, Ph.D., psychology, Lake Forest.,
Ching Shih, M.D., psychiatry, Monterey Park.
Tat Cheung, Ph.D., psychology, Monterey Park.
Bennet Omalu, MD, MBA, MPH, CPE, DABP-AP,CP,FP,NP; Chief Medical Examiner, Stockton.
Lt. David Smith of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s Office.
On May 28, 2016, while at the hospital, plaintiff Yvette Diaz's daughter, Auroranne Delatorre, died unexpectedly, the day after she was born. The Los Angeles County Coroner's office took possession of the body of Auroranne the next day.
On June 8, 2016, a representative from the office contacted Diaz to obtain additional information about the events that occurred just prior to Auroranne's death, along with Diaz's contact information. What was discussed during this call is disputed, but what is not disputed is that Ms. Diaz did not indicate whether or not she wanted her daughter’s body to be cremated. Diaz says that she later called that same representative three additional times but no one ever answered the phone.
The Coroner’s office left a voicemail for Diaz on July 11, 2016. The voicemail stated that the body had been at the Coroner’s office for 30 days and that Diaz should contact the office at her convenience. However, Diaz claims that she was not listening to her voicemails at this time as she was still grieving the loss of her first and only child. Auroranne's body was cremated 63 days after she died, on August 10, 2016. The Coroner's office sent Diaz a letter on Aug. 24, 2016 informing her of the cremation.
Diaz sued the County of Los Angeles, alleging violations by the Coroner's office of Health & Safety Code Section 7104.1. Plaintiff's counsel contended the section stated that only 30 days after the coroner, "...Notifies or diligently attempts to notify the person responsible for the interment of a decedent's remains which are in the possession of the coroner," and the person fails, refuses, or neglects to inter the remains, the coroner may inter the remains. Plaintiff contended that the office failed to properly notify her prior to cremating Auroranne.
The Coroner's office complied with Health & Safety Code Section 7104.1 when its investigator informed Diaz on June 8, 2016 that Auroranne's remains were in its possession and that, although the investigator advised Diaz that she needed to contact a funeral home immediately to make interment arrangements and to communicate and coordinate with the Coroner’s office, Diaz ignored her duty for arranging for interment. The defense further contended that plaintiff had a duty to inquire into the status of when the body of the deceased would be ready for release in order to fulfill her statutory duty to arrange for interment.
Emotional distress.
The Los Angeles County Coroner's office is now again sending out letters notifying the next of kin prior to cremating the deceased's body in cases where the family has failed to make arrangements for interment. This letter informs the family that the body is in the possession of the Coroner’s office, ready for pickup and if the family fails to act within a certain time frame the Coroner’s office will move forward with cremation. The Los Angeles County Coroner’s office handles approximately 10,000 cases a year.
This is not an official court document. While the publisher believes the information to be accurate, the publisher does not guarantee it and the reader is advised not to rely upon it without consulting the official court documents or the attorneys of record in this matter who are listed above.
© Copyright 2019 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. www.juryverdictalert.com