Passenger van driver tells passenger of depression and is fired. $1.2 million. Los Angeles County.
Van driver allegedly tells passenger of his depression and suicidal thoughts around the holidays; is later fired.
- Case Name: Francisco Tapia v. San Gabriel Transit, Inc.
- Court and Case Number: Los Angeles Superior Court / BC482433
- Date of Verdict or Judgment: Monday, November 16, 2015
- Date Action was Filed: Friday, April 06, 2012
- Type of Action: Employment, Wrongful Termination
- Judge or Arbitrator(s): Hon. Yvette Palazuelos
- Plaintiffs: Francisco Tapia, 46, bus driver
- Defendants: San Gabriel Transit, Inc.Access Services
- Type of Result: Jury Verdict
- Gross Verdict or Award: $1,289,849
- Award as to each Defendant:
$1.289 million against Defendant San Gabriel Transit.
Defendant Access Services is a quasi-governmental entity that contracts with San Gabriel Transit to provide paratransit services to disabled individuals throughout Southern California. Plaintiff argued that both San Gabriel Transit and Access were his employer (dual-employers). Jury found that Access was not plaintiff’s employer.
- Economic Damages:
- Non-Economic Damages:
- Punitive Damages:
- Trial or Arbitration Time: 7 days
- Jury Deliberation Time: 1 day
- Post Trial Motions & Post-Verdict Settlements: Attorneys' fees motion by plaintiff's counsel will be filed.
- Attorney for the Plaintiff:
Alder Law by Lauri L. Brenner and Marni Folinsky, Los Angeles.
Factum Law Group by Frank Alfonso, Pasadena.
- Attorney for the Defendant:
Manookian & Keshishian, APLC by Arno Keshishian, Glendale.
- Plaintiff’s Medical Expert(s):
Anthony Reading, Ph.D., psychology, Beverly Hills.
- Defendant's Medical Expert(s):
- Plaintiff's Technical Expert(s):
Timothy Lanning, Ph.D., economics, Los Angeles.
- Defendant's Technical Expert(s):
Facts and Background
- Facts and Background:
Plaintiff, Francisco Tapia, worked as a van driver for defendant for approximately 9 years before being fired. Shortly before the Christmas holidays he told a passenger that during the holiday he would become depressed and has thought of suicide. The passenger called plaintiff's employer to advise them of this comment. Defendant placed Mr. Tapia on a medical leave and fired him shortly thereafter.
- Plaintiff's Contentions:
Plaintiff contends he was fired due to his mental disability.
- Defendant's Contentions:
Defendant contends they fired plaintiff because they had received a call from another passenger that plaintiff was coming to her home uninvited, and fired plaintiff for that reason, not because of his depression and alleged suicidal thoughts.
Injuries and Other Damages
- Physical Injuries claimed by Plaintiff:
Demands and Offers
- Plaintiff Demand during Trial: $500,000
This is not an official court document. While the publisher believes the information to be accurate, the publisher does not guarantee it and the reader is advised not to rely upon it without consulting the official court documents or the attorneys of record in this matter who are listed above.
© Copyright 2023 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. www.juryverdictalert.com